Mistakes founders make during fundraising (from a cfo who has done 50+ M&A and Exit deals)
The Diary of a CFOMarch 26, 202600:38:05

Mistakes founders make during fundraising (from a cfo who has done 50+ M&A and Exit deals)

In this episode, I sit down with Julianne Averill, a healthcare AI CFO, board director, and fractional CFO with over 20 years of experience helping life science and digital health companies scale through fundraising, M&A, and IPOs. She has been through over 50 transactions on both the buy and sell side and currently serves as a fractional CFO working with multiple founders at once.

Most founders make the same fundraising mistakes and do not realize it until the cash is gone.

In this episode, I sit down with Julianne Averill, a healthcare AI CFO, board director, and fractional CFO with over 20 years of experience helping life science and digital health companies scale through fundraising, M&A, and IPOs. She has been through over 50 transactions on both the buy and sell side and currently serves as a fractional CFO working with multiple founders.

We break down how startup funding actually works from Seed all the way to IPO. What investors are really looking for at each stage. The difference between debt and equity and why getting that wrong can be one of the most expensive decisions a founder makes. The 9 mistakes she sees founders make during fundraising that kill deals before they start. What actually happens when a company goes public and why it is not the finish line most people think it is. How AI is changing the way investors discover and evaluate companies. And the ideal finance team structure as a company scales.

Whether you are raising capital, sitting on a board, or leading finance at a growing company, this episode covers the full picture.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Julianne shared sample pitch decks after our conversation. Grab both here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GlZiV70W4zIulXhFgf1Z9TtkeLyyzR7r

Key Takeaways:

1. Startup funding stages are about progressive de-risking, not just capital.

Series A bets on the founder and idea.

Series B evaluates proof of concept and early traction.

Series C and beyond assess whether you have built the infrastructure to scale and consistently deliver milestones that support a billion dollar trajectory.

2. Debt works when you already have equity capital and need to extend runway.

Equipment loans and similar debt vehicles allow equity funding to focus on development while debt covers capital-intensive needs. The mistake is thinking too narrowly and ignoring operations while building only the science or technology.

3. Scale your finance team based on complexity and stage, not headcount.

Bring on expertise when you need it and leverage fractional resources until you are using someone 40 hours per week or more. A pre-revenue company with simple operations needs different support than an early stage company that raised 300 million and plans to IPO within a year.

4. Going public is not the endpoint, it is the start of a new phase with external scrutiny.

Finance shifts from internal to external facing. You need infrastructure to produce quarterly public financials, business milestones to communicate consistently, and an executive team ready for the rigor of analyst calls and market reactions to every statement.

5. Finance must be involved early in M&A diligence to identify gaps others miss.

CFOs see the business at 10,000 feet and can spot missing obligations, compensation issues, and integration risks before closing. Agree upfront on what gets communicated during the process and by whom to avoid post-close surprises.

Noteworthy Quotes:

1. "It's either you pay now or you pay later. You can do your oil changes or you can wait till the catalytic converter blows up and then go fix it all at once."

2. "Going public is not the end state. It's the start of a new wave. Finance goes from an internal function to a very external facing organization where you're partnering with your CEO, your teams, and the CFO is directly talking to analysts and bankers."

3. "A strategic CFO is someone who understands the business and is really a partner to the CEO, the executive team and the board. Every single team member of finance and operations should be partners to the rest of the business."

4. "Bring on the expertise when you need it and leverage consultants until you get to that point where you're using somebody 40 hours or more per week."

5. "The biggest reality is it's not the end state. It's the start of a new wave. Everyone in the company starts to learn whatever you say out there can actually impact your stock price."

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:02.980
Welcome back to the Diary of a CFO podcast. I'm

00:00:02.980 --> 00:00:04.980
your host with Wassia Kamon. Each week we explore

00:00:04.980 --> 00:00:07.519
how top finance leaders help build high performing

00:00:07.519 --> 00:00:10.599
teams, partner with CEOs and boards and lead

00:00:10.599 --> 00:00:12.339
through growth and transformation without burning

00:00:12.339 --> 00:00:15.759
out in the process. Today's guest is Julianne Averill

00:00:16.039 --> 00:00:18.760
a healthcare AI CFO and board director with more

00:00:18.760 --> 00:00:28.379
than 20 years of experience. She serves on public

00:00:28.379 --> 00:00:31.079
and not -for -profit boards, chairs audit committees,

00:00:31.179 --> 00:00:33.420
and works with founders and executives on how

00:00:33.420 --> 00:00:36.780
to use AI thoughtfully in their businesses. So

00:00:36.780 --> 00:00:38.700
glad to have you on the show. Welcome, Jillian.

00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:41.039
I'm so glad to be here. Thank you for having

00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:44.060
me. Of course. Of course. I was always curious,

00:00:44.060 --> 00:00:46.759
you know, when I got to learn more about you,

00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:49.560
to understand how did you end up in the world

00:00:49.560 --> 00:00:52.280
of live science and biotech, especially as a

00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:55.100
CFO? Yeah, well that's a great question. It was

00:00:55.100 --> 00:00:57.780
one of those things where it was, I'd say slowly

00:00:57.780 --> 00:01:00.380
and then suddenly. So I started out in finance

00:01:00.380 --> 00:01:02.939
with an interest in numbers and then grew up,

00:01:02.960 --> 00:01:05.000
my parents were in the medical field. And so

00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:07.219
I'd always been that person who'd been exposed

00:01:07.219 --> 00:01:10.140
to the numbers, exposed to the health side of

00:01:10.140 --> 00:01:13.239
everything. And then about actually 10 years

00:01:13.239 --> 00:01:15.780
ago now, I had the opportunity to work for a

00:01:15.780 --> 00:01:18.640
healthcare information technology startup, CalIndex.

00:01:19.180 --> 00:01:21.280
And it was able to be, I was employee number

00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:24.040
13. So I was doing, it was awesome. I was doing

00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:26.680
everything from HR to finance to basically all

00:01:26.680 --> 00:01:29.799
the operations. And we scaled from this little

00:01:29.799 --> 00:01:32.780
tiny startup of 13 people to we became the largest

00:01:32.780 --> 00:01:34.939
healthcare information technology company in

00:01:34.939 --> 00:01:38.780
the entire US. So that was my really first biotech

00:01:38.780 --> 00:01:41.000
health tech company. And then kind of went from

00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:42.939
there and have been in life sciences ever since.

00:01:43.120 --> 00:01:46.099
Wow. And so at which point did you actually became

00:01:46.099 --> 00:01:48.540
a CFO? Cause I know now you're a fractional CFO.

00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:50.959
So I'm curious to hear your journey to first

00:01:50.959 --> 00:01:53.540
become CFO and then the one to become fractional

00:01:53.540 --> 00:01:55.819
CFO. Yeah, I know that's a great question. So

00:01:55.819 --> 00:01:59.140
how I became CFO was I started out initially

00:01:59.140 --> 00:02:02.519
in public accounting. So prior to the health

00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:05.359
IT company, I had to start in forensic accounting,

00:02:05.659 --> 00:02:07.739
interestingly enough. So really I was helping

00:02:07.739 --> 00:02:10.319
companies figure out like when things went wrong,

00:02:10.460 --> 00:02:13.389
why did it go wrong? And then I did the public

00:02:13.389 --> 00:02:15.550
accounting journey. So really helping companies

00:02:15.550 --> 00:02:17.729
figure out like their internal controls and all

00:02:17.729 --> 00:02:20.550
of that. And then went in -house. So I was at

00:02:20.550 --> 00:02:23.569
the health IT company. And then over time, my

00:02:23.569 --> 00:02:25.969
journey just took off as the companies I was

00:02:25.969 --> 00:02:28.969
at, we would go through mergers and growth and

00:02:28.969 --> 00:02:31.750
all of that. And so as I got more responsibilities,

00:02:32.069 --> 00:02:34.740
I moved up successfully. So I started at that

00:02:34.740 --> 00:02:37.020
company as a controller and moved into the VP

00:02:37.020 --> 00:02:40.120
finance role as I took on the finance side. And

00:02:40.120 --> 00:02:42.840
then eventually I moved into a biotech company

00:02:42.840 --> 00:02:46.159
that was actually using AI to develop drugs to

00:02:46.159 --> 00:02:48.620
treat depression. And then that was kind of my

00:02:48.620 --> 00:02:51.060
first CFO role because I was the one running

00:02:51.060 --> 00:02:53.360
the finance side of the house. And then from

00:02:53.360 --> 00:02:56.240
there, then I moved into a CFO role during COVID.

00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:59.620
So for a company that was developing a at -home

00:02:59.620 --> 00:03:02.719
infectious disease test. And then at that point,

00:03:02.729 --> 00:03:04.830
Since I've done so many of these companies where

00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:07.110
you're running the show, the company I'm at currently

00:03:07.110 --> 00:03:08.889
approached me and said, wow, since you've done

00:03:08.889 --> 00:03:11.689
all this work with companies that have done acquisitions

00:03:11.689 --> 00:03:14.110
have really gotten like, for example, that biotech

00:03:14.110 --> 00:03:16.590
company I was at, we prep for IPO. They're like,

00:03:16.689 --> 00:03:19.150
how about you come and be a full -time CFO for

00:03:19.150 --> 00:03:21.270
a bunch of fractional companies. That was five

00:03:21.270 --> 00:03:23.330
years ago. And I've done that ever since. Oh,

00:03:23.370 --> 00:03:27.009
wow. So when you went fractional, when you first

00:03:27.009 --> 00:03:29.550
got, you went to that fractional role, what surprised

00:03:29.550 --> 00:03:31.849
you the most? You know what surprised me the

00:03:31.849 --> 00:03:35.430
most? was two things. It's one, it was learning

00:03:35.430 --> 00:03:39.389
how to let go from you're basically an advisor.

00:03:39.550 --> 00:03:41.669
So you have that differentiation between being

00:03:41.669 --> 00:03:43.849
an owner, like when you're in health, you really

00:03:43.849 --> 00:03:45.949
want to say to the CEO, like, hey, this is what

00:03:45.949 --> 00:03:49.129
we need to do and then go fully execute. Whereas

00:03:49.129 --> 00:03:51.830
with an advisor, you are executing, but at some

00:03:51.830 --> 00:03:54.560
point you have to say, okay, if that... CEO wants

00:03:54.560 --> 00:03:56.900
to do something and it may be something that

00:03:56.900 --> 00:03:59.560
you disagree with, you can tell them, hey, here's

00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:01.479
what you should do. But if they still go do it,

00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:03.300
you let them go do it. And then the second thing

00:04:03.300 --> 00:04:07.159
I found was when I joined the current company

00:04:07.159 --> 00:04:10.159
I'm at, it was 2021. So we were still in the

00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:12.300
middle of the pandemic and we were starting to

00:04:12.300 --> 00:04:14.020
see a shift in life sciences. So we're starting

00:04:14.020 --> 00:04:18.019
to see a lot of that downturn. And what I found

00:04:18.019 --> 00:04:21.040
was as companies would struggle with funding,

00:04:21.459 --> 00:04:24.519
oftentimes you'd advise them like, Hey, if you

00:04:24.519 --> 00:04:27.060
don't think about these three or four things

00:04:27.060 --> 00:04:29.740
to fund your business, you're probably going

00:04:29.740 --> 00:04:32.339
to run out of cash before you get to accomplish

00:04:32.339 --> 00:04:34.139
what you want to do. Whether it's to bring your

00:04:34.139 --> 00:04:35.920
great drug to market, whether it's to achieve

00:04:35.920 --> 00:04:38.199
your next fundraising milestone or something

00:04:38.199 --> 00:04:40.839
like that. And I was amazed that oftentimes they

00:04:40.839 --> 00:04:43.480
wouldn't think about how they take that fuel,

00:04:43.759 --> 00:04:46.240
which is that cash or that funding, and be able

00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:48.720
to really see it through and ultimately would

00:04:48.720 --> 00:04:52.209
run out of cash. Wow. And so as a fractional

00:04:52.209 --> 00:04:55.490
CFO, you work with a lot of founders now. I'm

00:04:55.490 --> 00:04:57.930
curious to hear when founders come to you with

00:04:57.930 --> 00:05:00.730
a big vision, always have big vision, say our

00:05:00.730 --> 00:05:03.670
CEOs, how do you help them translate that into

00:05:03.670 --> 00:05:06.529
a financial plan that can actually support it?

00:05:06.529 --> 00:05:08.709
Cause like you said, you can have a big plan,

00:05:08.790 --> 00:05:10.509
but be short on their balance sheet, especially

00:05:10.509 --> 00:05:12.889
when it comes to cash. So how do you walk them

00:05:12.889 --> 00:05:14.430
through that journey? It's a great question.

00:05:14.569 --> 00:05:16.709
So how I walk them through that journey and it

00:05:16.709 --> 00:05:20.079
can be oftentimes they're coming to us and myself

00:05:20.079 --> 00:05:22.180
and maybe a team, it's really understanding where

00:05:22.180 --> 00:05:25.040
they want to end up. So they may give me a call

00:05:25.040 --> 00:05:27.939
and they may say they want to go IPO tomorrow,

00:05:28.220 --> 00:05:30.300
which is like, okay, well that may or may not

00:05:30.300 --> 00:05:33.959
happen, but we can try. Or they may be ultimately

00:05:33.959 --> 00:05:37.120
looking to be. acquired and be part of a larger

00:05:37.120 --> 00:05:39.379
pharma someday. But it's really working with

00:05:39.379 --> 00:05:42.980
that partner or CEO founder to understand what

00:05:42.980 --> 00:05:46.519
their ultimate vision is. So where do they want

00:05:46.519 --> 00:05:49.779
their company to go? And how do they want their

00:05:49.779 --> 00:05:52.980
technology or their therapeutic to live on? So

00:05:52.980 --> 00:05:55.279
are they taking it all the way like with us in

00:05:55.279 --> 00:05:58.000
development, we have different phases. So we

00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:00.600
have like that ideation phase, we have that development

00:06:00.600 --> 00:06:02.540
phase, like does it go through clinical trials

00:06:02.540 --> 00:06:04.639
oftentimes? And then we have that commercial

00:06:04.649 --> 00:06:07.209
And so I partner with them to see, okay, how

00:06:07.209 --> 00:06:09.529
far do they want to take this business? And then

00:06:09.529 --> 00:06:11.509
we kind of work backwards from there to develop

00:06:11.509 --> 00:06:13.910
that basically that long -term strategy and those

00:06:13.910 --> 00:06:15.810
financial models that can support them through

00:06:15.810 --> 00:06:18.509
that fundraising process. Okay. And so when you

00:06:18.509 --> 00:06:21.610
come in and you, like you said, I think in life

00:06:21.610 --> 00:06:24.569
sciences, the life cycle is quite long, right?

00:06:24.610 --> 00:06:27.129
Cause I used to work for a pharma company as

00:06:27.129 --> 00:06:30.250
well. Um, so how are you able to say to these

00:06:30.250 --> 00:06:32.649
businesses that have this kind of long life cycle,

00:06:32.870 --> 00:06:34.930
how do you keep cashing? your bank account? How

00:06:34.930 --> 00:06:37.050
do you get funded? Yeah, so it's interesting

00:06:37.050 --> 00:06:40.110
because oftentimes these companies may have no

00:06:40.110 --> 00:06:43.389
revenue or maybe early stage revenue. So a lot

00:06:43.389 --> 00:06:46.290
of it is founded almost on it's really understanding

00:06:46.290 --> 00:06:49.879
that valuation and that potential. And so what

00:06:49.879 --> 00:06:52.199
we're thinking through in terms of funding rounds

00:06:52.199 --> 00:06:55.220
is it depends on where they are in that development

00:06:55.220 --> 00:06:58.480
cycle. And so, for example, if they're very early

00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:01.160
stage, so they're really at that, okay, we're

00:07:01.160 --> 00:07:04.240
thinking about this idea where we have the science,

00:07:04.420 --> 00:07:06.459
but we don't have, okay, it hasn't gone through

00:07:06.459 --> 00:07:08.819
clinical development. We may not have gone through

00:07:08.819 --> 00:07:12.120
human proof of concept data. It's really showing

00:07:12.120 --> 00:07:15.560
the investors what they have available. So at

00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:17.660
that point it's the people, it's the early stage

00:07:17.660 --> 00:07:20.500
potential from any scientific studies they have,

00:07:20.540 --> 00:07:22.860
but it's really that long -term potential to

00:07:22.860 --> 00:07:25.500
see could this eventually become a drug that

00:07:25.500 --> 00:07:27.759
could help people. Then if they're later stage,

00:07:27.860 --> 00:07:29.319
and like let's say they're looking to go to the

00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:32.600
public markets, it's have they taken... whatever

00:07:32.600 --> 00:07:34.860
they developed and significantly do you risk

00:07:34.860 --> 00:07:37.319
it. Plus they've also have a built out the business

00:07:37.319 --> 00:07:40.060
to really be a standalone public company that

00:07:40.060 --> 00:07:43.360
can basically turn out different milestones quarterly,

00:07:43.779 --> 00:07:46.980
annually, and have a team that can really partner

00:07:46.980 --> 00:07:49.220
externally and build out that public company

00:07:49.220 --> 00:07:52.000
infrastructure. Okay. So now let's bring it back

00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:56.139
to just any company trying to go from where they

00:07:56.139 --> 00:07:58.980
are now. So that IDH and process all the way

00:07:58.980 --> 00:08:01.779
to IPO. Can you walk us through how that's. out

00:08:01.779 --> 00:08:05.139
of funding works from series A, B, all the way,

00:08:05.259 --> 00:08:08.899
all the way. I'd love to be a private company

00:08:08.899 --> 00:08:12.639
at Z. That'd be amazing. So really when you think

00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:15.459
about it, it's, and cause I know that the A,

00:08:15.459 --> 00:08:17.480
B, C and all that kind of starts to get muddy

00:08:17.480 --> 00:08:20.779
nowadays. A is really idea. So it's your, you're

00:08:20.779 --> 00:08:22.709
betting on the founder. You're betting on the

00:08:22.709 --> 00:08:24.829
founder and can they execute? So what do they

00:08:24.829 --> 00:08:26.589
have? Do they have a great product? Do they have

00:08:26.589 --> 00:08:29.269
a great team? Towards B, you're thinking about

00:08:29.269 --> 00:08:31.629
proof of concept. So have they started to build

00:08:31.629 --> 00:08:33.850
out the team? Have they started to get traction?

00:08:34.090 --> 00:08:36.269
So like if they have a product or service, do

00:08:36.269 --> 00:08:38.389
they have a minimum viable product or do they

00:08:38.389 --> 00:08:40.570
have early sales if they're a revenue generating

00:08:40.570 --> 00:08:43.570
company? By the time you get towards C, and this

00:08:43.570 --> 00:08:44.889
is kind of where it gets muddled because you

00:08:44.889 --> 00:08:48.429
could be B1, B2, C2, blah, blah, blah. But that

00:08:48.429 --> 00:08:52.100
is really about have you started to D. risk your

00:08:52.100 --> 00:08:54.879
asset, build out your team, and also have you

00:08:54.879 --> 00:08:56.899
start to build out the business to take you to

00:08:56.899 --> 00:09:00.000
that next stage. And the next stage can be again,

00:09:00.200 --> 00:09:02.580
the E to Fs or even the public market. So really

00:09:02.580 --> 00:09:05.820
are you able to scale and have consistent robust

00:09:05.820 --> 00:09:08.519
milestones or maybe you have more assets, more

00:09:08.519 --> 00:09:10.659
service lines, more segments and things like

00:09:10.659 --> 00:09:12.039
that. So it's kind of the way to think about

00:09:12.039 --> 00:09:14.639
it, basically that growth trajectory. And oftentimes

00:09:14.639 --> 00:09:17.220
investors are really looking for that billion

00:09:17.220 --> 00:09:19.860
dollar company. So what is it that's unique about

00:09:19.860 --> 00:09:22.000
the team, about the founder that's really going

00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:24.759
to take you from point A all the way up to that

00:09:24.759 --> 00:09:27.700
trajectory and that scale. And so as the companies

00:09:27.700 --> 00:09:30.809
are moving through these rounds, how do you help

00:09:30.809 --> 00:09:34.649
founders figure out whether debt or equity is

00:09:34.649 --> 00:09:37.529
a better choice? That is a great question on

00:09:37.529 --> 00:09:39.610
that perspective because it's really all about

00:09:39.610 --> 00:09:42.549
how do you found that company and how do you

00:09:42.549 --> 00:09:44.830
add that fuel to really get your company through

00:09:44.830 --> 00:09:47.490
to realize your vision? And so it's pulling those

00:09:47.490 --> 00:09:49.750
levers to say what is it that can extend your

00:09:49.750 --> 00:09:52.269
runway? And then also how do you think through

00:09:52.269 --> 00:09:54.789
what makes sense for the company long term? So

00:09:54.789 --> 00:09:57.049
when we think about debt, debt is always a good

00:09:57.049 --> 00:10:00.139
lever when a company company has additional capital.

00:10:00.360 --> 00:10:03.600
So like if it has equity with debt, then that

00:10:03.600 --> 00:10:05.460
means what debt can do is it can really enhance

00:10:05.460 --> 00:10:07.759
the company. Or oftentimes a lot of the companies

00:10:07.759 --> 00:10:10.460
I partner with, if they're very capital intensive,

00:10:10.659 --> 00:10:12.940
debt may be a good lever. So for example, equipment

00:10:12.940 --> 00:10:16.500
loans to really help find a way to leverage and

00:10:16.500 --> 00:10:18.779
extend the runway because you take out an equipment

00:10:18.779 --> 00:10:20.879
loan and then you can really think through, okay,

00:10:20.899 --> 00:10:23.519
I can use like my equity funding to then extend

00:10:23.519 --> 00:10:25.639
my runway and focus on the development side,

00:10:25.799 --> 00:10:27.320
whereas the debt is focused on the equipment.

00:10:27.179 --> 00:10:31.019
And so at which point would you say, especially

00:10:31.019 --> 00:10:33.519
for the founders that come to you when they're

00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:35.840
like, okay, I'm just calling you, I'm stressed

00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:38.120
out. What would you say are the biggest mistakes

00:10:38.120 --> 00:10:40.840
you see founders make during these fundraising

00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:43.820
rounds? Yeah. So it's when they call us and they're

00:10:43.820 --> 00:10:46.100
stressed out, it's, it's when they start to think

00:10:46.100 --> 00:10:48.980
too narrow and then they start to say, okay,

00:10:48.980 --> 00:10:52.019
I don't need X, Y, and Z. And by, I mean, X,

00:10:52.019 --> 00:10:54.000
Y, and Z. I mean, like, for example, if we're

00:10:54.000 --> 00:10:56.600
at mid stage, they forgo building the operation.

00:10:56.399 --> 00:10:59.620
and they focus exclusively on building just their

00:10:59.620 --> 00:11:02.100
science or their asset or their technology. Because

00:11:02.100 --> 00:11:04.440
the thing they always want to keep in mind is

00:11:04.440 --> 00:11:07.539
if they want to be a standalone company, how

00:11:07.539 --> 00:11:11.120
do you de -risk the full picture for investors?

00:11:11.340 --> 00:11:13.500
But also more importantly, where do they want

00:11:13.500 --> 00:11:17.620
to be as a company overall for themselves? And

00:11:17.620 --> 00:11:19.860
also talking to those investors that make sense

00:11:19.860 --> 00:11:22.100
to partner with them as well. because sometimes

00:11:22.100 --> 00:11:25.259
I see a mistake is they'll go for example a biotech

00:11:25.259 --> 00:11:28.129
may be talking to a tech investor that may not

00:11:28.129 --> 00:11:30.490
be fully aligned with their mission and vision.

00:11:30.549 --> 00:11:33.210
And then if they get funding from that tech investor,

00:11:33.289 --> 00:11:35.629
that may not work or vice versa, you know? So

00:11:35.629 --> 00:11:37.149
it's always making sure that you have the right

00:11:37.149 --> 00:11:39.429
funding from somebody who really aligns with

00:11:39.429 --> 00:11:42.210
your vision and vice versa. Okay. I'm always

00:11:42.210 --> 00:11:45.110
curious to hear, especially when it comes to

00:11:45.110 --> 00:11:48.129
cash management and building a sustainable business.

00:11:48.389 --> 00:11:50.970
Most founders don't have a background in finance.

00:11:51.210 --> 00:11:54.889
So what has been some advice or go -to moves

00:11:54.889 --> 00:11:58.350
you've done? to bring them along with you all

00:11:58.350 --> 00:12:00.450
the way. Because like you said, they may choose

00:12:00.450 --> 00:12:04.049
to say, I don't want XYZ, but you as a finance

00:12:04.049 --> 00:12:06.610
person, you know that XYZ is needed, whether

00:12:06.610 --> 00:12:08.950
it's for your investor relationship or just having

00:12:08.950 --> 00:12:11.529
enough runway to make it till the end. So what

00:12:11.529 --> 00:12:13.850
have been your go -to moves? Yeah. So my go -to

00:12:13.850 --> 00:12:16.009
moves are really to bring them along in the process.

00:12:16.049 --> 00:12:18.730
It's meaning that founder where they're at and

00:12:18.730 --> 00:12:21.409
then helping educate them in a way that makes

00:12:21.409 --> 00:12:23.950
sense for that person and that person's personality.

00:12:24.029 --> 00:12:26.899
And what I mean by that is sometimes if you have

00:12:26.899 --> 00:12:29.399
a founder that's early stage at a seed stage,

00:12:29.460 --> 00:12:32.340
they may not necessarily need a high power CFO.

00:12:32.700 --> 00:12:35.179
They may want a controller or head of finance

00:12:35.179 --> 00:12:37.360
who can be that day -to -day partner and can

00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:40.259
really get the tactical work done and really

00:12:40.259 --> 00:12:42.659
partner with them from that perspective. But

00:12:42.659 --> 00:12:45.379
then my role as a fractional CFO is to really

00:12:45.379 --> 00:12:47.620
be that strategic thought partner to them to

00:12:47.620 --> 00:12:49.659
check in with them periodically and see, okay,

00:12:49.779 --> 00:12:52.039
are you thinking about your next milestone or

00:12:52.039 --> 00:12:54.220
your next development process? And then really

00:12:54.220 --> 00:12:57.080
be there to answer any questions. It can be anything

00:12:57.080 --> 00:12:59.899
as simple as, okay, what should your monthly

00:12:59.899 --> 00:13:02.820
burn be for a company at this stage? So it's

00:13:02.820 --> 00:13:05.159
really being there to be their sounding board

00:13:05.159 --> 00:13:07.279
about these questions that will come up that

00:13:07.279 --> 00:13:09.659
they may be getting from investors on the finance

00:13:09.659 --> 00:13:11.340
side and help them think through those strategic

00:13:11.340 --> 00:13:13.759
items. Okay. I would like to pause a little bit

00:13:13.759 --> 00:13:17.620
here on the ideal finance structure as a company

00:13:17.620 --> 00:13:21.340
scales, right? We thinking, like you said, you

00:13:21.340 --> 00:13:24.389
start up maybe need a bookkeeper or controller,

00:13:24.590 --> 00:13:26.789
but you probably see also new fractional CFOs.

00:13:26.789 --> 00:13:29.309
So can you walk us a bit through how do funders

00:13:29.309 --> 00:13:32.590
can realize or other finance people realize when

00:13:32.590 --> 00:13:35.990
to grow the finance and accounting function and

00:13:35.990 --> 00:13:38.549
how, like which roles do you bring in at which

00:13:38.549 --> 00:13:41.330
point? That's a fantastic question because one

00:13:41.330 --> 00:13:43.230
of the things you want to do is you never want

00:13:43.230 --> 00:13:45.929
to, and this is for any role, is scale too early.

00:13:46.309 --> 00:13:48.470
And so the way to think about it, and this is

00:13:48.470 --> 00:13:51.049
probably due reason we have such a growth in

00:13:51.049 --> 00:13:53.570
fractional roles or even the reason my now exist

00:13:53.570 --> 00:13:57.690
is bring on the expertise when you need it and

00:13:57.690 --> 00:14:00.610
leverage consultants i .e. the fractional roles

00:14:00.610 --> 00:14:03.169
until you get to that point of okay you're using

00:14:03.169 --> 00:14:06.789
somebody 40 hours or more per week and specifically

00:14:06.789 --> 00:14:08.470
to your question about what do the teams look

00:14:08.470 --> 00:14:10.850
like at each stage it can be slightly different

00:14:10.850 --> 00:14:13.610
depending on the company so if you have a small

00:14:13.610 --> 00:14:16.710
company where they just have us operations and

00:14:16.710 --> 00:14:19.029
they're very simple maybe they're pre -revenue

00:14:19.029 --> 00:14:22.320
and their burn is a million dollars a month They

00:14:22.320 --> 00:14:24.419
may not need a very large team at the beginning,

00:14:24.679 --> 00:14:26.820
but then when they go public, they may need to

00:14:26.820 --> 00:14:29.779
supplement with additional technical resources,

00:14:29.940 --> 00:14:33.419
bring on the CFO, all of that, versus a early

00:14:33.419 --> 00:14:35.700
stage company that's technically a Series A,

00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:38.879
but has raised $300 million and plans to go IPO

00:14:38.879 --> 00:14:41.220
a year from now. That may need a bigger team.

00:14:41.399 --> 00:14:44.500
So the way to think about it is in terms of scale

00:14:44.500 --> 00:14:47.460
and in terms of complexity from the business

00:14:47.460 --> 00:14:50.879
operations too. Okay. When you think about the

00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:54.360
actual talent, so we agree on you need a controller.

00:14:55.039 --> 00:14:58.440
Um, but then who else do you need? Because at

00:14:58.440 --> 00:15:00.379
some point we have to think about internal controls.

00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:02.860
And once you go public, you want to build that

00:15:02.860 --> 00:15:05.279
structure before you go public. But unfortunately,

00:15:05.279 --> 00:15:08.220
a lot of people see accounting as a cost. Finance

00:15:08.220 --> 00:15:10.679
as you guys are too expensive. What are you doing?

00:15:11.100 --> 00:15:13.299
So what are your thoughts on that? My thoughts

00:15:13.299 --> 00:15:15.299
on that are it's either you pay now or you pay

00:15:15.299 --> 00:15:17.500
later. So the way to think about it is it's like

00:15:17.500 --> 00:15:19.919
deferred maintenance. on your car. So it's you

00:15:19.919 --> 00:15:22.360
can do your oil changes or you can wait till

00:15:22.360 --> 00:15:25.000
the catalytic converter blows up and then go

00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:27.840
fix it all at once. And so this is where the

00:15:27.840 --> 00:15:30.240
leverage of like a fractional model becomes really

00:15:30.240 --> 00:15:33.080
important is if you bring on strategic resources

00:15:33.080 --> 00:15:36.580
early, so like a strategic CFO, even strategic

00:15:36.580 --> 00:15:39.620
legal or ops, those are good resources to supplement

00:15:39.620 --> 00:15:42.580
even at a few hours a month because they can

00:15:42.580 --> 00:15:44.899
help you think through, okay, what are those

00:15:44.899 --> 00:15:48.389
roadblocks that you may be missing? And so that's

00:15:48.389 --> 00:15:50.450
the thing to think about is that I know I see

00:15:50.450 --> 00:15:52.250
a lot of founders sometimes forget is they'll

00:15:52.250 --> 00:15:54.129
say, okay, I want a controller now and I'll keep

00:15:54.129 --> 00:15:56.070
me running for a few years. And then they may

00:15:56.070 --> 00:15:58.450
find out the hard way that, okay, I should have

00:15:58.450 --> 00:16:00.470
been back to the debtor equity question. Maybe

00:16:00.470 --> 00:16:02.350
I could have been thinking about bringing on

00:16:02.350 --> 00:16:04.450
debt when I'm closing my round. And that's what

00:16:04.450 --> 00:16:06.950
a strategic CFO can really help them with because

00:16:06.950 --> 00:16:08.870
they tend to have the connections to the different

00:16:08.870 --> 00:16:10.649
lenders and think about the different sources

00:16:10.649 --> 00:16:13.590
of capital. Now I like how you keep saying strategic

00:16:13.590 --> 00:16:16.409
CFO. So I'm curious to hear what's your definition

00:16:16.409 --> 00:16:20.090
of strategic CFO. And as you think about the

00:16:20.090 --> 00:16:23.929
life cycle of a company, the maturity stages

00:16:23.929 --> 00:16:27.269
of the company, what kind of CFO do companies

00:16:27.269 --> 00:16:30.450
need at each stage? Yeah. So my definition of

00:16:30.450 --> 00:16:33.690
a strategic CFO is a CFO who understands the

00:16:33.690 --> 00:16:38.049
business and is really a partner to the CEO,

00:16:38.409 --> 00:16:41.090
the executive team, and the board. And that's

00:16:41.090 --> 00:16:43.409
regardless of industry. So it's somebody who

00:16:43.409 --> 00:16:47.029
really understands how the business runs. So

00:16:47.029 --> 00:16:50.289
what are the key drivers of revenue? If the company

00:16:50.289 --> 00:16:53.789
has revenue or the product development. So like

00:16:53.789 --> 00:16:56.110
in biotech, oftentimes we're pre -revenue. So

00:16:56.110 --> 00:16:58.330
you really need to understand that at the CFO

00:16:58.330 --> 00:17:01.769
level. And then even down into the lower levels

00:17:01.769 --> 00:17:04.430
too, for finance. So every single team member

00:17:04.430 --> 00:17:07.109
of finance and operations should really be those

00:17:07.109 --> 00:17:10.390
partners to the rest of the business. how that's

00:17:10.390 --> 00:17:12.410
how we end up transitioning from what we're reviewed

00:17:12.410 --> 00:17:15.450
as a cost center to more of a partner. for the

00:17:15.450 --> 00:17:17.950
rest of the business value driver. Okay. And

00:17:17.950 --> 00:17:20.589
then as the company mature, so part of the startup

00:17:20.589 --> 00:17:23.990
stage, what are the kind of skills that founders

00:17:23.990 --> 00:17:26.829
or CFO may want to bring in? Because how you

00:17:26.829 --> 00:17:29.250
run a business when it's just scaling or pre

00:17:29.250 --> 00:17:31.450
-revenue is definitely different than when you

00:17:31.450 --> 00:17:34.990
are or you pass the startup stage. Now you have,

00:17:35.069 --> 00:17:37.650
let's say quality compliance to be done and all

00:17:37.650 --> 00:17:40.509
that other good stuff. Yeah. So the, the skillsets

00:17:40.509 --> 00:17:42.609
to bring in beyond that stage. So really the

00:17:42.609 --> 00:17:44.910
growth stage in the public stage are in. who

00:17:44.910 --> 00:17:47.930
are very familiar with internal controls and

00:17:47.930 --> 00:17:50.279
then additionally Individuals who are familiar

00:17:50.279 --> 00:17:53.839
with leveraging technology to build segregation

00:17:53.839 --> 00:17:56.940
of duties and compliance. So really to make it

00:17:56.940 --> 00:17:59.660
easy for the business to get greater insights

00:17:59.660 --> 00:18:02.859
faster. And what I mean by that is like, for

00:18:02.859 --> 00:18:04.819
example, we're starting to see a lot of growth

00:18:04.819 --> 00:18:07.359
with artificial intelligence being able to give

00:18:07.359 --> 00:18:10.420
us financial data sooner, but really you need

00:18:10.420 --> 00:18:12.880
individuals who can understand how to weigh the

00:18:12.880 --> 00:18:16.000
pros and cons of what type of technology to implement.

00:18:16.220 --> 00:18:18.019
So that way you can give your business partners,

00:18:18.079 --> 00:18:21.319
so like your manufacturing team or your commercial

00:18:21.319 --> 00:18:24.180
team data that they can use to make decisions.

00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:26.099
And that's really important. And then of course,

00:18:26.160 --> 00:18:27.859
when you go public, you really need to make sure

00:18:27.859 --> 00:18:30.940
you have your technical team either outsourced

00:18:30.940 --> 00:18:32.839
or in -house so that way you can deal with your

00:18:32.839 --> 00:18:35.279
SEC compliance requirements as well. Oh, let's

00:18:35.279 --> 00:18:38.160
talk about that part because you do that a lot.

00:18:40.240 --> 00:18:42.559
What are some of the things you will say you

00:18:42.559 --> 00:18:45.599
wish people knew about going public? Because

00:18:45.599 --> 00:18:48.259
when we hear a company going public, everybody's

00:18:48.259 --> 00:18:51.480
thinking mula money coming in. But what are the

00:18:51.480 --> 00:18:55.099
realities of transitioning from the startup stage

00:18:55.099 --> 00:18:58.299
to becoming a public company? The biggest reality

00:18:58.299 --> 00:19:01.740
is it's not the end state. It's the start of

00:19:01.740 --> 00:19:04.799
a new wave. And so that's the piece that I think

00:19:04.799 --> 00:19:07.259
is always an evolution for a lot of individuals

00:19:07.259 --> 00:19:10.259
to understand. And that is a big transition for

00:19:10.259 --> 00:19:12.000
a lot of companies, especially when it happens

00:19:12.000 --> 00:19:14.920
very fast, because all of a sudden finance goes

00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:18.319
from more of an internal function to the, it

00:19:18.319 --> 00:19:21.529
becomes a very external facing organization,

00:19:21.730 --> 00:19:25.250
where you're partnering even more so with your

00:19:25.250 --> 00:19:28.529
CEO, with your teams and even, I mean, the CFO

00:19:28.529 --> 00:19:30.750
is directly talking oftentimes to analysts, to

00:19:30.750 --> 00:19:32.430
bankers and everything to say, okay, here's what's

00:19:32.430 --> 00:19:34.349
going on with the company. And then more importantly,

00:19:34.849 --> 00:19:36.769
everyone in the company starts to learn whatever

00:19:36.769 --> 00:19:39.609
you say out there can actually impact, you have

00:19:39.609 --> 00:19:42.089
a stock price and that can impact things. And

00:19:42.089 --> 00:19:44.490
a lot of individuals who have been in just the

00:19:44.490 --> 00:19:47.490
private company world may not understand that.

00:19:47.630 --> 00:19:50.910
So it's a, it's a mind. And it's a good fun mind

00:19:50.910 --> 00:19:53.230
shift, but it's also just, okay, you go IPO and

00:19:53.230 --> 00:19:55.269
you're not done. It's your starting and it literally

00:19:55.269 --> 00:19:57.950
starts from day one and you hit the ground running.

00:19:58.309 --> 00:20:00.890
And basically depending on when you go IPO, it

00:20:00.890 --> 00:20:02.849
can be three months after that your queues out

00:20:02.849 --> 00:20:05.150
or it can be who knows two weeks after that.

00:20:05.210 --> 00:20:06.750
So it just depends on what day you pick to go

00:20:06.750 --> 00:20:09.450
public. Okay. And what would you say is the right

00:20:09.450 --> 00:20:12.230
thing to do when a company should stay private

00:20:12.230 --> 00:20:15.920
versus going through a public. offering. It really

00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:18.359
depends on what the objectives are of the company

00:20:18.359 --> 00:20:21.039
long term. We are starting to see a lot of this

00:20:21.039 --> 00:20:23.160
trend come back, which was around actually when

00:20:23.160 --> 00:20:26.500
I was at my company, the AI neuro company, which

00:20:26.500 --> 00:20:28.519
is they're thinking through doing the dual track

00:20:28.519 --> 00:20:31.500
of IPO and M &A. Number one is, is the company

00:20:31.500 --> 00:20:34.039
ready for the rigor of being a public organization?

00:20:34.180 --> 00:20:37.019
So do they have the operational infrastructure

00:20:37.019 --> 00:20:40.119
to turn out public company financials and public

00:20:40.119 --> 00:20:42.559
company reporting every quarter? But more importantly

00:20:42.559 --> 00:20:45.119
too, on the business side, Do they have those

00:20:45.119 --> 00:20:47.619
upcoming milestones? So where are they at? Are

00:20:47.619 --> 00:20:50.059
they like, if it's revenue generating, what does

00:20:50.059 --> 00:20:51.740
their product line look like? Are they going

00:20:51.740 --> 00:20:54.920
to have a good cadence of product initiatives?

00:20:55.099 --> 00:20:56.740
Are they going to have different milestones where

00:20:56.740 --> 00:20:58.640
they can really say, okay, every single quarter,

00:20:58.920 --> 00:21:00.700
we're going to have something come out because

00:21:00.700 --> 00:21:02.940
they really are. It's almost like you now have

00:21:02.940 --> 00:21:05.160
a flashlight shown on the company that wasn't

00:21:05.160 --> 00:21:06.460
there when you're private. And so it's really

00:21:06.460 --> 00:21:09.319
understanding is the organization ready for that?

00:21:09.319 --> 00:21:11.759
And is the executive team ready for that as well

00:21:11.759 --> 00:21:14.500
as the board? Okay. that's what the IPO what

00:21:14.500 --> 00:21:16.900
about the M &A route? Yeah so the M &A route

00:21:16.900 --> 00:21:20.259
makes more sense in a couple situations. One

00:21:20.259 --> 00:21:24.200
is if there is a synergistic M &A where it's

00:21:24.200 --> 00:21:27.160
like you meet you may have a partner like a merger

00:21:27.160 --> 00:21:29.539
of equals situation where you may have somebody

00:21:29.539 --> 00:21:32.359
who's a complementary product or a product that

00:21:32.359 --> 00:21:34.660
could align really well where you can fit in

00:21:34.660 --> 00:21:36.680
nicely with that organization. So that's a good

00:21:36.680 --> 00:21:39.200
opportunity. Or if you're looking to go public

00:21:39.200 --> 00:21:42.299
but then as you're looking to go public a larger

00:21:42.319 --> 00:21:45.240
organization may say, okay, you actually make

00:21:45.240 --> 00:21:47.680
sense to be in our complimentary portfolio. Then

00:21:47.680 --> 00:21:49.759
that may make sense for you to say, okay, this

00:21:49.759 --> 00:21:52.339
is a better path for us long -term versus being

00:21:52.339 --> 00:21:54.640
standalone. Because if we think about what is

00:21:54.640 --> 00:21:56.680
the end state of our business and our product,

00:21:56.740 --> 00:22:00.000
let's go that route. Okay. M &A is another term,

00:22:00.339 --> 00:22:03.279
just like IPO, we hear mula when we hear, like,

00:22:03.299 --> 00:22:05.779
we're getting bigger. And then finance and accounting

00:22:05.779 --> 00:22:13.059
is like, oh, we scared. Go ahead. Oh, you can

00:22:13.059 --> 00:22:15.839
feel it. No, exactly. Well, it's funny because

00:22:15.839 --> 00:22:18.640
I've been through, I think, on both sides, the

00:22:18.640 --> 00:22:20.640
buy side and sell side. I think I've been through

00:22:20.640 --> 00:22:24.200
over 50 in my career. And I think the thing is

00:22:24.200 --> 00:22:26.859
the transition with the people, the finance and

00:22:26.859 --> 00:22:29.490
the operation. So there's like. three different

00:22:29.490 --> 00:22:31.910
sides to M &A that people just don't even realize.

00:22:32.150 --> 00:22:34.670
Yeah. So curious to hear your stories, especially

00:22:34.670 --> 00:22:37.190
around the buy side versus the sell side. Like

00:22:37.190 --> 00:22:39.210
what are the things you probably learned the

00:22:39.210 --> 00:22:41.869
hard way and now recommend people do? What are

00:22:41.869 --> 00:22:45.250
they on each side? Yeah. I think, um, on the

00:22:45.250 --> 00:22:48.250
thing I recommend people don't do is don't ignore

00:22:48.250 --> 00:22:50.769
the people on the transactions, especially when

00:22:50.769 --> 00:22:53.130
you're thinking about these ones, like the mergers

00:22:53.130 --> 00:22:55.349
of equals concept, where when you're combining

00:22:55.349 --> 00:22:57.930
companies, because there's value between the

00:22:57.930 --> 00:23:00.299
combined organizations. Because where I've seen

00:23:00.299 --> 00:23:03.740
that go awry is if, for example, you don't think

00:23:03.740 --> 00:23:06.059
about, okay, lockup agreements for the individuals,

00:23:06.099 --> 00:23:08.319
so you don't think about the compensation arrangements

00:23:08.319 --> 00:23:11.259
beforehand, you may lose key individuals from

00:23:11.259 --> 00:23:14.779
both teams. Or the other piece too is if you're

00:23:14.779 --> 00:23:18.220
scaling an organization and you combine the two

00:23:18.220 --> 00:23:19.839
organizations, now all of a sudden you have double

00:23:19.839 --> 00:23:22.740
of everything potentially. So you may have two

00:23:22.740 --> 00:23:25.960
IT organizations, your finance teams, you may

00:23:25.960 --> 00:23:29.039
have one organization that's more robust or oftentimes

00:23:29.039 --> 00:23:31.799
the transactions I've been through, especially

00:23:31.799 --> 00:23:34.759
on the buy side, we had a very robust finance

00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:37.619
team and then we acquired a company that. didn't

00:23:37.619 --> 00:23:39.500
and we hadn't, and sometimes we hadn't thought

00:23:39.500 --> 00:23:41.859
through, okay, what does that look like? So it

00:23:41.859 --> 00:23:44.400
would oftentimes take a lot of cleanup of that

00:23:44.400 --> 00:23:46.559
organization post transaction. And there wasn't

00:23:46.559 --> 00:23:48.819
consideration around how long that cleanup truly

00:23:48.819 --> 00:23:51.119
takes. So it was things like that to think about

00:23:51.119 --> 00:23:54.180
upfront. And then on the sales side, like you

00:23:54.180 --> 00:23:56.200
just said, you, you acquire a company, you have

00:23:56.200 --> 00:23:58.619
to do more cleanup. What would you say and how

00:23:58.619 --> 00:24:00.900
should finance be involved when they're in the

00:24:00.900 --> 00:24:04.019
sales side process or the buy side process? Because

00:24:04.019 --> 00:24:07.150
I feel like we often not included. conversation

00:24:07.150 --> 00:24:09.230
and then it's like why don't you guys have your

00:24:09.230 --> 00:24:14.029
stuff together by now we should be involved as

00:24:14.029 --> 00:24:16.809
early as as possible because of the lens we have

00:24:16.809 --> 00:24:19.730
in finance we tend to see businesses at that

00:24:19.730 --> 00:24:23.130
like 10 000 foot level so we can identify early

00:24:23.130 --> 00:24:26.109
on in the diligence process if there's gap in

00:24:26.109 --> 00:24:28.829
the organization so like you can look at a finance

00:24:28.829 --> 00:24:31.740
um like you look at the balance sheet oftentimes

00:24:31.740 --> 00:24:35.200
and see, okay, are they missing key obligations?

00:24:35.519 --> 00:24:38.039
Or is there something that we see post -close

00:24:38.039 --> 00:24:40.859
where if we look at the employee agreements,

00:24:40.960 --> 00:24:43.660
is there some employee that may or may not have

00:24:43.660 --> 00:24:46.160
a compensation agreement that should have? Or

00:24:46.160 --> 00:24:48.519
does somebody have some interesting compensation

00:24:48.519 --> 00:24:50.920
agreement that may become an issue afterwards?

00:24:51.039 --> 00:24:53.779
And so if we get involved in the diligence process,

00:24:53.779 --> 00:24:56.579
we can usually see pretty quickly some of the

00:24:56.579 --> 00:24:59.500
potential things to look out for during a transaction.

00:24:59.440 --> 00:25:03.319
I'm curious to hear any war story or horror story,

00:25:03.319 --> 00:25:05.619
I should say, during the M &A deal. Like you

00:25:05.619 --> 00:25:10.480
were like, ooh, we're not doing this again. The

00:25:10.480 --> 00:25:13.480
one was, there was one I was dealing with where,

00:25:13.539 --> 00:25:15.400
so I was on the side where we all agreed that

00:25:15.400 --> 00:25:17.779
we were going to keep it as confidential as possible

00:25:17.779 --> 00:25:19.279
because we all knew the transaction was going

00:25:19.279 --> 00:25:21.779
to happen about six months beforehand. On the

00:25:21.779 --> 00:25:24.400
other side, and this was from most of the employees,

00:25:24.440 --> 00:25:26.220
so there's only a handful of individuals who

00:25:26.220 --> 00:25:28.460
knew, the senior executives and that was it.

00:25:28.519 --> 00:25:30.859
The other side, because it was we were combining

00:25:30.859 --> 00:25:33.779
the companies, the other side did not opt to

00:25:33.779 --> 00:25:36.539
do that. So they told the entire organization

00:25:36.539 --> 00:25:39.660
of 40 people that they were going to get acquired.

00:25:39.950 --> 00:25:42.869
So because of that, they started changing things

00:25:42.869 --> 00:25:45.589
in advance of the pending acquisition. And so

00:25:45.589 --> 00:25:47.589
they would do things like they raise people's

00:25:47.589 --> 00:25:50.029
salaries, gave them promotions. And then they

00:25:50.029 --> 00:25:53.509
also decided part of the combination was we were

00:25:53.509 --> 00:25:56.150
planning to combine a new tech platform. So they

00:25:56.150 --> 00:25:57.849
also decided to go change the tech platform.

00:25:57.950 --> 00:25:59.890
And so we now had a situation where we had to

00:25:59.890 --> 00:26:03.690
deal with not just combination of two tech platforms,

00:26:03.789 --> 00:26:07.799
we had a third one. So is a lesson learned? I

00:26:07.799 --> 00:26:10.319
would make sure that everyone agrees up front

00:26:10.319 --> 00:26:13.299
who's involved in the diligence process, what

00:26:13.299 --> 00:26:15.940
we're going to be communicating beforehand, during,

00:26:15.940 --> 00:26:19.279
and after. Because those decisions made by the

00:26:19.279 --> 00:26:21.960
team on the other side led to some interesting

00:26:21.960 --> 00:26:24.559
dynamics post -close. Wow. Yeah, that sounds

00:26:24.559 --> 00:26:29.740
like the worst. Yeah. It created some fun integration

00:26:29.740 --> 00:26:33.839
concerns. Oh, wow. Thanks for sharing. Now, looking

00:26:33.839 --> 00:26:37.599
ahead, I know there's a lot about technology

00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:41.599
changing fundraising, uh, whether it's MNA going

00:26:41.599 --> 00:26:45.119
IPO. Do you think AI is changing the way investors

00:26:45.119 --> 00:26:47.900
discover or evaluate companies? Like how does

00:26:47.900 --> 00:26:52.180
it affect that CEO CFO relationship? Yeah. So

00:26:52.180 --> 00:26:55.450
I do think AI is changing it in a good way. And

00:26:55.450 --> 00:26:58.569
what I mean by that is AI is allowing number

00:26:58.569 --> 00:27:02.029
one for the potential discovery of organizations

00:27:02.029 --> 00:27:05.029
that may or may not have been targets beforehand,

00:27:05.549 --> 00:27:08.509
because you can do a lot more diligence quicker.

00:27:08.809 --> 00:27:11.849
with AI. Anyone at this point can build a simple

00:27:11.849 --> 00:27:14.769
agent within their LLM of choice that says, okay,

00:27:14.769 --> 00:27:17.529
I want to discover X, Y, and Z and target these

00:27:17.529 --> 00:27:19.309
industries. So you have that all the way to you

00:27:19.309 --> 00:27:22.289
have fully robust built out diligence agents

00:27:22.289 --> 00:27:24.490
that can really help you figure out these processes.

00:27:24.710 --> 00:27:27.650
So that is speeding up the M &A process as well

00:27:27.650 --> 00:27:30.049
as the IPO process. And then what that means

00:27:30.049 --> 00:27:33.809
for CFOs and CEOs is you can also expect deeper

00:27:33.809 --> 00:27:37.250
questions during the M &A and IPO process. And

00:27:37.250 --> 00:27:39.680
then as well as you may get a random outreach

00:27:39.680 --> 00:27:42.279
or inbound from investors that you may not have

00:27:42.279 --> 00:27:44.400
even thought of before. But on the flip side,

00:27:44.680 --> 00:27:48.500
CFOs and CEOs can use AI to think about, okay,

00:27:48.599 --> 00:27:51.059
if you want to ultimately go through a transaction

00:27:51.059 --> 00:27:53.480
or IPO process, who are those targets you want

00:27:53.480 --> 00:27:55.700
to reach out to? So who are those investors or

00:27:55.700 --> 00:27:58.039
who are those strategic partners that you may

00:27:58.039 --> 00:27:59.819
not have originally thought? thought of that

00:27:59.819 --> 00:28:02.339
could be tangential to your typical targets.

00:28:02.740 --> 00:28:06.240
Nice. Nice. I'm always looking for stories, right?

00:28:08.460 --> 00:28:10.779
Is there any set out story from your time as

00:28:10.779 --> 00:28:14.259
a CFO that really taught you something you want?

00:28:14.930 --> 00:28:18.309
CEOs, founders, or finance leaders to here. Because

00:28:18.309 --> 00:28:21.809
like you said, AI is changing how we do M &A,

00:28:21.930 --> 00:28:24.710
IPO, how we do finance, how we do work overall.

00:28:25.049 --> 00:28:27.670
But one thing I'm sure is there are certain things

00:28:27.670 --> 00:28:29.769
that will not necessarily change. Like you said,

00:28:29.829 --> 00:28:31.849
for example, there is an M &A. Let's agree on

00:28:31.849 --> 00:28:34.750
what we say, what we don't say. What is probably

00:28:34.750 --> 00:28:38.150
a story that helped you kind of develop your

00:28:38.150 --> 00:28:42.069
to do and to don't list? Yeah, one was interesting

00:28:42.069 --> 00:28:44.799
to me and it was actually about five or six years

00:28:44.799 --> 00:28:48.019
ago. So it was one of the first venture funds

00:28:48.019 --> 00:28:50.539
I've come across that was actually using AI in

00:28:50.539 --> 00:28:55.279
its process was I did diligence. I was sitting

00:28:55.279 --> 00:28:59.559
CFO in -house and we were doing a series B fundraise

00:28:59.559 --> 00:29:01.900
and a venture fund approach us and their entire

00:29:01.900 --> 00:29:04.319
process was done by AI. So they actually let

00:29:04.319 --> 00:29:06.700
the algorithm determine whether to invest in

00:29:06.700 --> 00:29:08.900
us or not. And the way it worked was it was a

00:29:08.900 --> 00:29:11.640
two -part process. They met with us. So it was

00:29:11.640 --> 00:29:14.319
the analyst and then the algorithm recorded our

00:29:14.319 --> 00:29:16.480
pitch and then they went through our data room

00:29:16.480 --> 00:29:18.299
and that's it. And then they give you a score

00:29:18.299 --> 00:29:21.430
and then they say yes or no. Wow. That was the

00:29:21.430 --> 00:29:23.450
most interesting thing to me but what I took

00:29:23.450 --> 00:29:25.910
away from it was they did give us compliments

00:29:25.910 --> 00:29:28.289
on our data room, ultimately decided not to invest

00:29:28.289 --> 00:29:30.069
because of the stage of the product. What I took

00:29:30.069 --> 00:29:32.609
away from it was make sure our pitch is on point

00:29:32.609 --> 00:29:35.250
and then also always make sure your data room

00:29:35.250 --> 00:29:39.569
is clean and truly tells your story of the company

00:29:39.569 --> 00:29:41.890
because you never know, okay, when somebody is

00:29:41.890 --> 00:29:44.009
going to choose to say we're going to rely on

00:29:44.009 --> 00:29:47.329
this technology that we've built that has our

00:29:47.329 --> 00:29:50.640
internal knowledge and go with it. Wow. See,

00:29:50.779 --> 00:29:53.140
this kind of thing makes me both excited and

00:29:53.140 --> 00:29:55.940
scared at the same time, right? I'm excited because

00:29:55.940 --> 00:29:59.359
it means that I can check myself, right? If I

00:29:59.359 --> 00:30:02.319
have that algorithm, I can double check to see

00:30:02.319 --> 00:30:04.500
where are the gaps in my data room, for example,

00:30:04.799 --> 00:30:08.000
the gaps in my pitch. So it allows me to be ready,

00:30:08.259 --> 00:30:11.099
but then... can be scary if you have been in

00:30:11.099 --> 00:30:13.640
this process for a while and now AI comes and

00:30:13.640 --> 00:30:16.460
you're like, oops, where do I start? Exactly.

00:30:16.640 --> 00:30:18.420
Yeah. And so that's always the hard part is like,

00:30:18.559 --> 00:30:20.480
you have to think about, okay, how do I prepare?

00:30:20.940 --> 00:30:23.019
But then the AI can also conversely, it's like,

00:30:23.079 --> 00:30:26.200
okay, that AI was judging us, but then now we

00:30:26.200 --> 00:30:29.329
have access to AI that can help us prep. and

00:30:29.329 --> 00:30:31.789
think through what we're missing. So that's always

00:30:31.789 --> 00:30:34.329
a good, that's a positive of it versus, okay,

00:30:34.490 --> 00:30:37.170
the AI is telling you yes or no, it's going to

00:30:37.170 --> 00:30:40.309
invest. Okay. And in your experience with fundraising

00:30:40.309 --> 00:30:44.829
and M &A IPO, we can see how the CFO role is

00:30:44.829 --> 00:30:49.309
becoming more and more involved and be that second

00:30:49.309 --> 00:30:52.170
person in charge next to the CEO. What are some

00:30:52.170 --> 00:30:54.769
things you will say should be included? Like

00:30:54.769 --> 00:30:57.250
people should make sure they include in their

00:30:57.250 --> 00:30:59.740
fundraising pitch. Yeah, so in their fundraising

00:30:59.740 --> 00:31:03.940
pitch, I'd always include who the team is. And

00:31:03.940 --> 00:31:07.259
importantly, what one of the things in the pitch

00:31:07.259 --> 00:31:10.180
that typically happens is they put logos of everybody.

00:31:10.339 --> 00:31:13.059
I would go a step deeper and say, here's who

00:31:13.059 --> 00:31:16.549
everyone. like where they came from and why they

00:31:16.549 --> 00:31:19.309
are the perfect people for this team. So really

00:31:19.309 --> 00:31:22.670
having that piece of it and then the other piece

00:31:22.670 --> 00:31:24.950
is of course what you plan to do with the funds.

00:31:25.049 --> 00:31:28.109
So sometimes that gets left off and then one

00:31:28.109 --> 00:31:30.509
item that I've also seen because you really only

00:31:30.509 --> 00:31:32.849
want five slides like usually in a teaser slide

00:31:32.849 --> 00:31:34.970
then of course you have the detailed conversations

00:31:34.970 --> 00:31:37.869
everything but really the why you should invest

00:31:37.869 --> 00:31:40.269
and then why you shouldn't invest. So like here's

00:31:40.269 --> 00:31:42.750
your overview slide so somebody can see really

00:31:42.750 --> 00:31:45.019
quickly What is it that makes you special? But

00:31:45.019 --> 00:31:47.299
then conversely, the ones that do really well

00:31:47.299 --> 00:31:49.779
are the ones that have said, here's why you shouldn't.

00:31:49.900 --> 00:31:52.859
And here's the things that why, like why we think

00:31:52.859 --> 00:31:54.920
you might not be the right person for us. And

00:31:54.920 --> 00:31:58.579
we've thought through those. Nice. Nice. Yeah.

00:31:58.619 --> 00:32:01.559
Definitely wanted a simple deck for the audience

00:32:01.559 --> 00:32:04.960
when you get it. Yeah. Exactly. Cause the deck

00:32:04.960 --> 00:32:07.640
really leads to a conversation. Yes. And I like

00:32:07.640 --> 00:32:09.819
that you keep it at five slides and not like

00:32:09.819 --> 00:32:15.700
a... Exactly. Everybody is busy and they want

00:32:15.700 --> 00:32:18.119
to see, okay, yes, I want a conversation or no,

00:32:18.160 --> 00:32:19.920
this is not right for us. And if it's not right

00:32:19.920 --> 00:32:21.799
for you, what'll happen is oftentimes investors

00:32:21.799 --> 00:32:24.119
will say, I may not be right for you, but I may

00:32:24.119 --> 00:32:27.880
know this person who is. And how, what are some

00:32:27.880 --> 00:32:29.880
of the things that helped you become a better

00:32:30.200 --> 00:32:33.180
picture if I can say a better fundraiser as a

00:32:33.180 --> 00:32:36.019
financial person because you're studying in forensic

00:32:36.019 --> 00:32:37.700
accounting, which means you were part of the

00:32:37.700 --> 00:32:40.039
people who said something is wrong, which is

00:32:40.039 --> 00:32:43.660
quite different from giving me money. Exactly.

00:32:43.880 --> 00:32:45.680
Well, it was interesting because back then you

00:32:45.680 --> 00:32:47.099
had to say what was wrong, but you also had to

00:32:47.099 --> 00:32:51.359
go on the stand. and explain in basically, well,

00:32:51.420 --> 00:32:53.480
one of my partners I worked with used to say,

00:32:53.599 --> 00:32:55.319
we have to explain this in terms that a 10 year

00:32:55.319 --> 00:32:57.539
old can understand. So like, for example, dividends,

00:32:57.900 --> 00:33:00.819
that's always fun trying to explain to someone

00:33:00.819 --> 00:33:04.099
or at the time the mortgage industry was collapsing.

00:33:04.319 --> 00:33:06.700
So credit default swaps, trying to explain that

00:33:06.700 --> 00:33:09.299
very simply was challenging. So what makes you

00:33:09.299 --> 00:33:12.660
a better pitcher is understanding communication.

00:33:12.859 --> 00:33:16.059
So I found some of the biggest skills that have

00:33:16.059 --> 00:33:19.079
helped me in my career are actually non -finance

00:33:19.079 --> 00:33:22.619
skills. So for example, I took a negotiation

00:33:22.619 --> 00:33:27.319
class in college that has been a great class

00:33:27.319 --> 00:33:29.700
for me because it tells me how to learn how to

00:33:29.700 --> 00:33:34.019
listen more than I speak. And even today, I really

00:33:34.019 --> 00:33:36.559
enjoy listening to individuals. So I listen to

00:33:36.559 --> 00:33:41.220
a great podcast, Diary of a CEO. I love hearing

00:33:41.220 --> 00:33:44.039
those individuals talk about communication. Because

00:33:44.039 --> 00:33:46.420
that's really what a pitch is, is it's how do

00:33:46.420 --> 00:33:49.160
you talk to somebody and deciding on both sides

00:33:49.160 --> 00:33:51.819
of the table. Does this make sense for a long

00:33:51.819 --> 00:33:54.740
-term, basically partnership? Nice. Nice. Yeah.

00:33:54.980 --> 00:33:57.359
I also realized that in my career, at some point

00:33:57.359 --> 00:33:59.859
you're, you cap out of your technical skills,

00:34:00.119 --> 00:34:02.400
taking you somewhere. It's like everything is

00:34:02.400 --> 00:34:06.380
more on the human side slash softer side of skills.

00:34:06.799 --> 00:34:08.840
Now. I have two more questions for you before

00:34:08.840 --> 00:34:12.599
I leave. First, you are a board member. You've

00:34:12.599 --> 00:34:18.239
been advising boards. And I feel like, especially

00:34:18.239 --> 00:34:20.300
in the CFO community, C -suite community, I've

00:34:20.300 --> 00:34:22.699
noticed that being on the board feels like the

00:34:22.699 --> 00:34:25.880
next natural step, right? Helping with governance

00:34:25.880 --> 00:34:28.119
and things like that. What would you say people

00:34:28.119 --> 00:34:31.340
should also be mindful of getting on the board?

00:34:31.530 --> 00:34:33.750
Exactly. It's a great question. So the other

00:34:33.750 --> 00:34:36.309
thing to be mindful of is a board tends to be

00:34:36.309 --> 00:34:40.449
a longer term journey and relationship than your

00:34:40.449 --> 00:34:42.730
CFO journey. Because when you're committing to

00:34:42.730 --> 00:34:45.389
a board, you're committing for whether things

00:34:45.389 --> 00:34:49.119
go right. or things go wrong because what happens

00:34:49.119 --> 00:34:52.199
is you're, you're there, but you're not in the

00:34:52.199 --> 00:34:55.179
day to day. So the phrase is always often knows

00:34:55.179 --> 00:34:58.320
in fingers out, which means like, okay, our tendency

00:34:58.320 --> 00:35:01.119
as CFOs is really again to the details, but the

00:35:01.119 --> 00:35:03.539
board level, we really need to. to help with

00:35:03.539 --> 00:35:06.260
governance. So making sure we ask the right questions.

00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:08.360
And so when you're thinking about whether the

00:35:08.360 --> 00:35:10.900
board journey is right for you, it's really asking,

00:35:10.960 --> 00:35:13.119
and this was part of my journey is, okay, do

00:35:13.119 --> 00:35:15.340
I align with the mission of the company? And

00:35:15.340 --> 00:35:17.900
is it a place where I can truly make a difference?

00:35:18.059 --> 00:35:20.800
And so can I really say, okay, what value can

00:35:20.800 --> 00:35:23.980
I add to that particular company? And is it a

00:35:23.980 --> 00:35:26.340
company where I really want to help them grow?

00:35:26.340 --> 00:35:28.639
And what can I bring to the table? So like we

00:35:28.639 --> 00:35:30.780
were talking about the M &A and IPO experience,

00:35:31.019 --> 00:35:33.449
the company, the board's I've chosen to join

00:35:33.449 --> 00:35:37.090
tend to have that need. And they also have that

00:35:37.090 --> 00:35:38.670
healthcare alignment because that tends to be

00:35:38.670 --> 00:35:42.409
where my passion is. Oh, nice. Nice. Any, any

00:35:42.409 --> 00:35:44.429
scary story you want to share about being on

00:35:44.429 --> 00:35:49.949
the board or dealing with the board? Of course,

00:35:50.070 --> 00:35:52.710
all poor conversations are confidential also.

00:35:53.250 --> 00:35:57.849
Um, I'd say one. Yeah, one of the more interesting

00:35:57.849 --> 00:36:00.369
conversations I've had at the board table is

00:36:00.369 --> 00:36:05.869
often when you're dealing with board conversations,

00:36:06.670 --> 00:36:10.369
I've gone in calls out of the blue where someone

00:36:10.369 --> 00:36:12.670
has done something that they probably shouldn't

00:36:12.670 --> 00:36:16.190
have, and then we've had to deal with the consequences.

00:36:16.570 --> 00:36:19.570
And so that's always the challenge is where we've

00:36:19.570 --> 00:36:23.710
had a management team member do something and

00:36:23.920 --> 00:36:26.320
we've had to figure out how to do that and also

00:36:26.320 --> 00:36:28.519
how to have that conversation with them about

00:36:28.519 --> 00:36:31.619
number one, why did they do what they did? And

00:36:31.619 --> 00:36:33.679
then number two, how do we address it? So that's

00:36:33.679 --> 00:36:36.659
always the part. It's like, how do you, because

00:36:36.659 --> 00:36:38.539
when you're at the board, everyone on your board

00:36:38.539 --> 00:36:41.659
is a peer and then your management team is also

00:36:41.659 --> 00:36:44.699
there to, you're there to help guide them. So

00:36:44.699 --> 00:36:47.159
that's the conversations that we tend to have.

00:36:47.340 --> 00:36:50.039
Oh, good. Sounds good. Then last thing, last

00:36:50.039 --> 00:36:53.360
thing I promise. What's your favorite thing to

00:36:53.360 --> 00:36:56.739
do outside of work? My favorite thing. Oh, outside

00:36:56.739 --> 00:36:59.159
of work, it's fun doing a lot of different things.

00:36:59.239 --> 00:37:02.460
But right now my favorite thing is I spend a

00:37:02.460 --> 00:37:05.440
lot of time on my Peloton app and that means

00:37:05.440 --> 00:37:08.150
I'm running. Yes, I'm running with my dog. So

00:37:08.150 --> 00:37:10.030
we've been doing a lot of training for races.

00:37:10.550 --> 00:37:14.130
And I recently just did the half marathon, um,

00:37:14.230 --> 00:37:16.710
down in surf city. So Huntington beach by the

00:37:16.710 --> 00:37:20.050
beach. So it was awesome. Oh, so you race with

00:37:20.050 --> 00:37:22.750
your dog. I do. Well, she doesn't go to the races

00:37:22.750 --> 00:37:24.809
because if we did, so she's a Siberian Husky.

00:37:24.909 --> 00:37:26.809
She would totally just want to meet everybody.

00:37:30.550 --> 00:37:33.829
But she's my training partner. So every morning

00:37:33.829 --> 00:37:36.030
she makes sure that we get out the door because

00:37:36.030 --> 00:37:39.420
if we don't. Huskies love to talk. She talks

00:37:39.420 --> 00:37:41.480
to me and tells me that I'm procrastinating.

00:37:41.719 --> 00:37:44.940
So she's the best personal trainer ever. Oh,

00:37:44.940 --> 00:37:48.599
wow. That is so cute. Oh, thank you so much for

00:37:48.599 --> 00:37:51.159
sharing. This was such a great conversation.

00:37:51.619 --> 00:37:53.679
I hope we get to see a little sample of your

00:37:53.679 --> 00:37:56.940
PJs because I always get questions from the audience

00:37:56.940 --> 00:37:59.679
about practical ways that they can apply some

00:37:59.679 --> 00:38:01.400
of the things that our guests are sharing. So

00:38:01.400 --> 00:38:03.840
thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Yeah.

00:38:03.840 --> 00:38:05.219
Thank you. This has been awesome.